Whistleblower Policy


The board of APRIL is committed to operating legally (in accordance with applicable legislation and regulation), properly (in accordance with organisational policy and procedures), and ethically (in accordance with recognised ethical principles). Employees are expected to cooperate with the organisation in maintaining legal, proper, and ethical operations, if necessary by reporting non-compliant actions by other people. Correspondingly, employees who do assist in maintaining legal, proper, and ethical operations should not be penalised in any way.


The purpose of this policy is to:

  1. encourage the reporting of matters that may cause harm to individuals or financial or non- financial loss to APRIL or damage to its reputation;
  2. enable APRIL to deal with reports from whistleblowers in a way that will protect the identity of the whistleblower as far as possible and provide for the secure storage of the information provided;
  3. establish policies for protecting whistleblowers against reprisal by any person internal or external to the entity;
  4. provide for the appropriate infrastructure; and
  5. help to ensure APRIL maintains the highest standards of ethical behaviour and integrity.


Disclosures related to “personal work-related grievances” are not covered by the new whistleblower protections.  Workplace grievances will remain the jurisdiction of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Further, where a disclosure is not made in good faith or on reasonable grounds, it will fall under the Code of Conduct policy and the Whistleblower policy will not provide protection.

A personal work-related grievance is defined as “a grievance about any matter in relation to the discloser’s employment, or former employment, having (or tending to have) implications for the discloser personally”.  Typical examples would include:

  • personal conflicts within the workplace;
  • decisions relating to engagement, promotion and termination of employees; and
  • ordinary workplace bullying disputes.

However, whistleblower protections do apply if the disclosure also:

  • concerns a detriment to the discloser caused by alleged victimisation; or
  • is made to a legal practitioner to obtain legal advice regarding the whistleblower provisions; or
  • has significant implications for the company and concerns alleged conduct that could be an offence, or contravention, as discussed below.

The law recognises that some personal work-related grievances may involve very serious wrongdoing entitling the discloser to protection.

Complaints regarding occupational health and safety should where possible be made through the organisation’s occupational health and safety procedures.


A whistleblower is a person (being a director, manager, employee or contractor of, or volunteer for, Australasian Pork Research Institute Ltd) who, whether anonymously or not, makes, attempts to make or wishes to make a report in connection with reportable conduct and wishes to avail themselves of protection against reprisal for having made the report.

Breaches of general law, organisational policy, or generally recognised principles of ethics include:

  • corrupt conduct;
    • fraud or theft;
    • official misconduct;
    • maladministration;
    • harassment or unlawful discrimination;
    • serious and substantial waste of public resources;
    • practices endangering the health or safety of staff, volunteers, or the general public ;
    • practices endangering the environment.

Whistleblower Protection Officer (WPO) means the Chair of the company’s Audit Committee, or if the there is a vacancy in the office of Chair of the company’s Audit committee, the person appointed by the Board to fulfil this role.


APRIL’s board is responsible for adopting the whistleblower policy.

The Whistleblower Protection Officer is responsible for:

  1. coordinating an investigation into any report received from a whistleblower; and
  2. documenting and handling all matters in relation to the report and investigation, and finalising all investigations.

The organisation’s CEO is responsible for the implementation of the whistleblower policy.

All staff and all volunteers are responsible for reporting breaches of general law, organisational policy, or generally recognised principles of ethics to a person authorised to take action on such breaches.


External reporting entities

The board may nominate external persons to whom or agencies to which disclosures may be made under the protections offered under this policy. Where such a nomination is made, staff and volunteers should be informed by any appropriate method.


Concerns regarding illegal or corrupt behaviour and improper or unethical behaviour

Where an employee of APRIL believes in good faith on reasonable grounds that any other employee, volunteer, or contractor has breached any provision of the general law or has breached any provision of the APRIL constitution, or its bylaws, or its policies, or its code of conduct, or generally recognised principles of ethics, that employee must report their concern to:

  • their supervisor; or,
    • if they feel that their supervisor may be complicit in the breach, the CEO; or,
    • if they feel that the CEO may be complicit in the breach, the organisation’s nominated Whistleblower Protection Officer (WPO); or,
    • in the case of illegal or corrupt behaviour, the duly constituted authorities responsible for the enforcement of the law in the relevant area.

The person making their concern known shall not suffer any sanctions from the organisation on account of their actions in this regard provided that their actions:

  • are in good faith; and
    • are based on reasonable grounds; and
    • conform to the designated procedures.

These procedures do not authorise any employee to inform commercial media or social media of their concern, and do not offer protection to any employee who does so.

Any person reporting such a breach should be informed that as far as lies in the organisation’s power, the employee will not be disadvantaged for the act of making such a report.

Any such report should, where possible, be in writing and should contain, as appropriate, details of:

  • the nature of the alleged breach;
  • the person or persons responsible for the breach;
  • the facts on which the complainant’s belief that a breach has occurred, and has been committed by the person named, are founded;
  • the nature and whereabouts of any further evidence that would substantiate the complainant’s allegations, if known.


If the complainant wishes to make their complaint anonymously, their wish shall be honoured except insofar as it may be overridden by due process of law, however, reporting such a breach does not necessarily absolve the complainant from the consequences of any involvement on their own part in the misconduct complained of.

The complainant should, however, be informed that the maintenance of such anonymity may make it less likely that the alleged breach can be substantiated in any subsequent investigation.

Where anonymity has been requested the complainant is required to maintain confidentiality regarding the issue on their own account and to refrain from discussing the matter with any unauthorised persons.


On receiving a report of a breach, the person to whom the disclosure is made shall:

  • if they believe the behaviour complained of to be unquestionably trivial or fanciful, dismiss the allegation and notify the person making the allegation of their decision;
    • if they believe the behaviour complained of to be neither trivial nor fanciful, put in motion the investigation process described below.

The person to whom the disclosure was made shall notify the WPO, who shall be responsible for ensuring that an investigation of the charges is established.

Terms of reference for the investigation will be drawn up, in consultation with the CEO (unless the CEO is subject to the complaint, in which case the Board Chair will be consulted), to clarify the key issues to be investigated.

An investigation plan will be developed to ensure all relevant questions are addressed, the scale of the investigation is in proportion to the seriousness of the allegation(s) and sufficient resources are allocated.

Strict security will be maintained during the investigative process.

All information obtained will be properly secured to prevent unauthorised access.

All relevant witnesses will be interviewed and documents examined.

Where possible, interviews will be recorded.

Contemporaneous notes of all discussions, phone calls and interviews will be made.

Evidence to support such concerns should be brought forward at this time if it exists. The absence of such evidence will be taken into account in subsequent consideration of whether to open an investigation into the matter. However, absence of such evidence is not an absolute bar to the activation of the organisation’s investigative procedures. The existence of such a concern is sufficient to trigger reporting responsibilities.

The principles of procedural fairness (natural justice) will be observed. In particular, where adverse comment about a person is likely to be included in a report, the person affected will be given an opportunity to comment beforehand and any comments will be considered before the report is finalised.


A report will be prepared when an investigation is complete. This report will include:

  • the allegations;
  • a statement of all relevant findings of fact and the evidence relied upon in reaching any conclusions;
  • the conclusions reached (including the damage caused, if any, and the impact on the organisation and other affected parties) and their basis;
  • recommendations based on those conclusions to address any wrongdoing identified and any other matters arising during the investigation.

Information to informant

Subject to considerations of the privacy of those against whom the allegations are made and customary practices of confidentiality, the whistleblower will be kept informed of:

  • relevant progress of an investigation;
  • relevant outcomes of an investigation.

Protection of informant

Where the investigation has found that the person making the allegation acted in good faith on reasonable grounds, the WPO will be responsible for ensuring that the person suffers no employment-related disadvantage on account of their actions in this matter and to provide reasonable additional support for the person where necessary.